SBIR-STTR Award

Automated Intravenous Anesthesia Delivery to Improve Outcome in Children-Tivapeds
Award last edited on: 3/3/2021

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
NIH : NIGMS
Total Award Amount
$1,713,692
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
-----

Principal Investigator
Stephane Bibian

Company Information

NeuroWave Systems Inc

2490 Lee Boulevard Suite 300
Cleveland Heights, OH 44118
   (216) 361-1591
   info@neurowavesystems.com
   www.neurowavesystems.com
Location: Single
Congr. District: 11
County: Cuyahoga

Phase I

Contract Number: 1R43GM112358-01
Start Date: 9/15/2014    Completed: 9/14/2015
Phase I year
2014
Phase I Amount
$217,487
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in children offers significant improvement in outcomes in comparison to inhaled anesthesia that is predominantly used in the developed world. For example, it has been shown that TIVA results in a two-and-a-half fold reduction in emergence delirium (ED), which refers to a variety of behavioral disturbances commonly seen in children following emergence from anesthesia. ED can predispose children to lasting memory impairment and maladaptive behavior development. The incidence of ED in pediatric anesthesia procedures using inhaled agents may be as high as 40% and is highest in children aged 2-6 years. However, despite its important benefits, TIVA is not widely used since this technique is quite difficult to administer manually. This is due to the lack of a direct measure of drug concentration in the blood, and due to the need for constant adjustments in drug infusion rate. This program will address this problem by performing a feasibility study regarding outcomes of the TIVAPedsTM device for automated delivery of TIVA in children, based on noninvasive measurements of their brain activity. The overall goal of this Phase I am to explore whether it is possible to achieve improved outcomes associated with TIVA by using the TIVAPeds system. The Specific Aims of this 2-year Phase I program include collection and analysis of clinical data in children at two clinical institutions. At the first insitution, data will be collected from 20 children undergoing TIVA delivered by the TIVAPeds closed-loop system using our NeuroSENSE depth-of-anesthesia monitor. This system has already received Federal (Health Canada) and institution's Research Ethics Board approval, and has been successfully used in prior clinical studies involving pediatric patients. The second institution wil collect data from children receiving inhaled anesthesia, delivered using standard clinical practice. The data from the two study arms will be compared and analyzed to assess differences in outcome measures. Results will be used for the design of a pivotal clinical study protocol, for demonstrating safety and efficacy of the TIVAPeds system during the Phase II effort. The ultimate objective is to commercialize the TIVAPeds device in order to enable wider use of TIVA and bring its benefits to a large number of pediatric patients.

Thesaurus Terms:
Accounting;Address;Adoption;Affect;Aged;Agitation;Anesthesia Procedures;Anesthetics;Base;Behavior;Behavioral;Blood;Brain;Breathing;Canada;Child;Childhood;Clinical;Clinical Data;Clinical Practice;Clinical Research;Clinical Trials;Collection;Complex;Consumption;Control Groups;Cost;Country;Data;Delirium;Design;Development;Devices;Dose;Drug Delivery Systems;Drug Kinetics;Electrodes;Electroencephalography;Empowered;European;Event;Feasibility Studies;Feedback;Goals;Health;Human;Hypnotic;Improved;Incidence;Infusion Procedures;Infusion Pumps;Inhalation Anesthetics;Institution;Intravenous;Intravenous Anesthesia;Learning;Manuals;Measurement;Measures;Memory;Memory Impairment;Methods;Modeling;Monitor;Nature;Nausea And Vomiting;Neurotoxicity;Operative Surgical Procedures;Outcome;Outcome Measure;Patients;Pediatric Hospitals;Pediatrics;Penetration;Pharmaceutical Preparations;Pharmacodynamics;Phase;Plasma;Postoperative Pain;Postoperative Period;Programs;Property;Propofol;Protocols Documentation;Public Health Relevance;Pump;Regimen;Remifentanil;Reporting;Research Ethics;Safety;Signal Transduction;Standard Of Care;Stimulus;Stream;System;Techniques;Technological Innovation;Technology;Two-Arm Study;United States Food And Drug Administration;Variant;

Phase II

Contract Number: 2R44GM112358-02
Start Date: 00/00/00    Completed: 00/00/00
Phase II year
2019
(last award dollars: 2020)
Phase II Amount
$1,496,205

SPECIFIC AIMS The overall objective of this Program is to develop the TIVAPeds, an anesthesia ‘auto-pilot’ drug delivery platform designed to administer Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) in children 2-yrs and older. The proposed platform integrates a brain monitor whose output is used to automatically and continuously adjust the delivery of propofol based on the care provider’s targeted effect. We believe that this device will become an enabling technology facilitating the wider penetration of TIVA in pediatric anesthesia, both domestically and abroad, and will ultimately lead to a safer practice, and improved outcome. Rationale: TIVA has been shown to be a superior anesthesia regimen as compared to inhaled anesthesia with respect to intra-operative events and post-operative outcome [1]. In particular, the incidence of laryngospasms/bronchospasms, Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), and emergence agitation are significantly reduced [2]. For instance, TIVA with propofol and remifentanil was associated with a lower rate of emergence delirium (38.3% vs. 14.9%) and a lower postoperative pain score [3]. In addition, volatile anesthetics have been shown to be neurotoxic in the developing brain of all animal models tested to-date rats, mice, guinea pigs, piglets, and rhesus monkeys) [5, 25]. A recent study has shown a statistically significant association between cumulative exposure to inhaled anesthesia and worse full-scale/verbal/performance IQ and processing speed [27]. Other retrospective studies have reached similar conclusions with respect to learning disabilities [28, 29], development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [30], and deficits in language/abstract reasoning [32]. It is therefore not surprising that in some pediatric anesthesia departments, like the BC Children Hospital (Vancouver, BC, Canada), the use of TIVA has become the standard of care [4]. This comes in sharp contrast to the practice in the US, where inhaled anesthesia is still primarily used, mostly for reasons of convenience and training. Indeed, when using inhalation anesthetics, end-tidal volatile anesthetic concentration measures provide a real-time estimate of the volatile anesthetic concentration in the plasma blood. Complex pharmacokinetics effects are thus made transparent to the clinicians, who can adjust their titration accordingly. Similar methods are not available when using intravenous agents, which makes the practice of TIVA more difficult and error prone. Yet, in most countries, the use of TIVA has seen a steady increase over the last 15 years. This increase has been made possible by the availability of Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) pumps. These specialty pumps embed drug models that are used to calculate an infusion profile designed to quickly reach a steady-state drug blood plasma concentration, thereby accounting for the drug’s uptake, distribution, and elimination. However, the open loop nature of these pumps makes them prone to over/under-dosing due inter-patient variability, which is particularly large in children. Due to concerns over the inadequacy of these pharmacological models, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has declined to approve TCI pumps for human use. The practice of TIVA in the US remains therefore fully manual. Thorough understanding of drug’s pharmacokinetics and dynamics is therefore a pre-requisite. As a result, the use of inhaled anesthesia is regarded as more convenient and safer in the hands of less experienced care providers, despite the more beneficial safety and outcome profile of TIVA. The proposed system – TIVAPeds – intends to facilitate the practice of TIVA by providing anesthesia care providers with an ‘auto-pilot’ for the delivery of propofol, based on the level of brain activity. During the course of the surgery, the system automatically and continuously adjusts the administration of the drug to drive and maintain the patient into a desired state, based on direct physiological feedback from the patient him/herself. Changes in cortical state due to variations in the surgical stimuli intensity are also automatically compensated. The potential for technological innovation is substantial. The TIVAPeds is an enabling technology aimed at making TIVA easier and safer to administer. Based on a direct feedback of drug effect, inter-patient pharmacological variability and the complex drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are automatically accounted for. By design, the TIVAPeds will provide the same favorable safety and outcome profile as TIVA, without the requirement of a steep learning curve, increased workload, or the potential for human errors in dosing. In addition, we expect such closed-loop system will be inherently safer (always vigilant and reacting faster to changes in the patient’s state) and will empower clinicians to deliver optimal anesthetic dose to their patients for improved outcomes. The Specific Aim of this 24-month Phase II project is to advance the research prototype, which was clinically evaluated as part of the Phase I work, into a product-level platform ready for regulatory clinical trials. This platform will leverage prior and current development work. Further controller design and verification, per FDA’s input, will be carried out using the methodology developed and validated in the Phase I. The FDA provided us with detailed recommendations to guide our development and clinical work, which form the basis of the research plan. The goal of this Phase II is to obtain an Investigational Device Exemption to initiate clinical trials in the US. The commercial opportunity is substantial. TIVA has the potential to becoming a standard of care in pediatric anesthesia, provided a safe and effective supporting technology like the TIVAPeds exists. The use of TIVAPeds is predicated on the use of proprietary administration sets providing a stream of recurring revenues.

Public Health Relevance Statement:
PROJECT NARRATIVE Total IntraVenous Anesthesia (TIVA) in children offers significant advantages in terms of outcomes in comparison to commonly used inhaled anesthesia. In order to make the practice of TIVA more accessible and safer, we have developed an anesthesia auto-pilot - TIVAPeds - which automatically and continuously adjusts the administration of TIVA to maintain the patient in an optimal anesthetic depth. This auto-pilot was successfully tested in the feasibility phase of this program, and we now plan to develop the final commercial platform based on the FDA’s written recommendations and guidance as part of the Phase II work.

Project Terms:
Accounting; Agitation; Anesthesia procedures; Anesthetics; Animal Model; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; base; Brain; Bronchial Spasm; Canada; care providers; Cavia; Child; Childhood; Clinical; Clinical Trials; Complex; Country; Delirium; design; Development; Devices; Dose; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Kinetics; Drug Modelings; Event; experience; Exposure to; Feedback; Goals; Hematologic Agents; Human; human error; improved outcome; Incidence; Infusion procedures; Infusion Pumps; Inhalation Anesthesia; Inhalation Anesthetics; interpatient variability; Intravenous; Intravenous Anesthesia; Investigation; Language; Laryngismus; Lead; Learning; Learning Disabilities; Macaca mulatta; Manuals; Measures; medical specialties; Methodology; Methods; Modeling; Monitor; Mus; Nature; neurotoxic; Operative Surgical Procedures; Outcome; Output; pain score; Patients; Pediatric Hospitals; Penetration; Performance; Pharmaceutical Preparations; pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; Pharmacology; Phase; Physiological; Plasma; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Postoperative Pain; Postoperative Period; processing speed; programs; Propofol; prototype; Pump; Rattus; Recommendation; Regimen; remifentanil; Research; Retrospective Studies; Safety; standard of care; Stimulus; Stream; System; technological innovation; Technology; Testing; Time; Titrations; Training; United States Food and Drug Administration; uptake; Variant; Work; Workload