SBIR-STTR Award

Restoring Arm And Hand Motor Function With Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation.
Award last edited on: 9/30/13

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
NIH : NIBIB
Total Award Amount
$206,411
Award Phase
1
Solicitation Topic Code
-----

Principal Investigator
William A Alaynick

Company Information

Neuro-Recovery Technologies (AKA: Neuroenabling Technologies Inc)

2200 Linda Flora Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90077
   (949) 292-9646
   N/A
   www.neurorecoverytechnologies.com
Location: Single
Congr. District: 33
County: Los Angeles

Phase I

Contract Number: 1R43EB017641-01
Start Date: 8/1/13    Completed: 7/31/14
Phase I year
2013
Phase I Amount
$206,411
Of the approximately 10 million people in the US living with paralysis, 15,000 are the result of spinal cord injury each year. The first year of car can range from $322,000-$986,000, with lifetime costs of $1.4-4M for someone injured at 25 years of age. In addition to potentially devastating sensorimotor disturbances, there is a huge financial cost, estimated to be $13.55B in medical care, therapy, and lost productivity nationwide. Until very recently, the recovery from spinal cord injury (SCI) was bleak, with little hope of restoring motor function. To address this we have demonstrated that the physiological state of the spinal circuitry of rats and cats can be modulated with epidural stimulation to generate voluntary limb motor function over a range of speeds, loads, and directions, a finding we have extended to humans. Three years post-injury, a motor complete spinal cord injured human subject was implanted with an epidural electrode array over the lumbosacral spinal cord. In less than one month after implantation, the subject could stand independently, and after 7 months of daily epidural stimulation and motor training, voluntary control of both legs was evident in the presence of epidural stimulation, whereas complete paralysis remained in absence of epidural stimulation. We will advance these discoveries with the use of non-invasive stimulation of the cervical cord to improve arm and hand function following SCI. Central to this proposal is our discovery of a painless electrical single-channel (stimulation of one part of the spinal cord) and dual-channel (stimulation of two different parts of the cord) paradigm that can be applied to the surface of the skin, termed transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES), bypassing the need for a surgically-implanted electrode array. In the first phase of this proposal we will demonstrate proof-of-principle that stimulation of the cervical spinal cord can improve motor function by: 1) Testing responses to transcutaneous electrical stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury; and 2) defining the operational parameters of electrical stimulation that that are most effective using a machine-learning protocol, and 3) produce a dual-channel commercial prototype. This commercial product will undergo testing similar to the proof- of-principle device. This device will then be tested in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury and evaluated with a machine-learning protocol. This Phase I proposal will deliver a device that can painlessly and non-invasively aid in the recovery of SCI by delivering a specific electrical stimulation paradigm to the cervical cord that improves use of the arms and hands.

Public Health Relevance Statement:


Public Health Relevance:
Electrical modulation of the spinal cord can restore voluntary motor function in patients with spinal cord injury, a phenomenon we have demonstrated with both implantable electric devices and devices that provide electrical stimulation to the cord through the surface of the skin. Here, we propose to build and test a refined device that stimulates the skin above the spinal cord at two different locations to improve arm and hand motor function in spinal cord injury patients.

Project Terms:
Address; Age-Years; Algorithms; Ankle; arm; Back; Bypass; Caring; Cervical; Cervical spinal cord injury; Cervical spinal cord structure; Chronic; Clinic; Clinical; Clinical Trials; comparative efficacy; Data; design; Devices; Electric Stimulation; Electrodes; Felis catus; Financial cost; Goals; grasp; Hand; Hand functions; Hip region structure; Human; human subject; Implant; implantation; Implanted Electrodes; improved; improved functioning; Individual; injured; Injury; Intervention; Knee; Leg; Life; life time cost; Limb structure; Location; Lower Extremity; Lumbar spinal cord structure; Machine Learning; Measurement; Medical; Methods; Modality; Motor; motor function improvement; Motor Skills; Muscle; Music; Neck; neuroregulation; Neurostimulation procedures of spinal cord tissue; Outpatients; Painless; Paralysed; Patients; Performance; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Phase; Physiological; Productivity; Protocols documentation; prototype; public health relevance; Rat-1; Rattus; Recovery; Recruitment Activity; response; Sensory; Site; Skin; Speed (motion); Spinal; Spinal Cord; Spinal cord injury; Spinal cord injury patients; Spinal Cord Part; stroke; Surface; Techniques; Technology; Testing; Time; Toes; Training; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Translating; Upper Extremity; Weight-Bearing state

Phase II

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: 00/00/00    Completed: 00/00/00
Phase II year
----
Phase II Amount
----