SBIR-STTR Award

Human Behavior Architecture Interface for Integrated Cognitive and Task Performance Model Development
Award last edited on: 4/7/2010

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
DOD : Army
Total Award Amount
$850,000
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
A03-036
Principal Investigator
Christian Lebiere

Company Information

Alion MA&D Operation (AKA: Micro Analysis & Design Inc)

4949 Pearl East Circle Suite 300
Boulder, CO 80301
   (303) 442-6947
   info@maad.com
   www.maad.com
Location: Multiple
Congr. District: 02
County: Boulder

Phase I

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase I year
2004
Phase I Amount
$120,000
As the Army transforms itself into an organization of the future, emphasis on acquiring new military systems and training soldiers to use those new systems is a primary challenge. These transformation programs are also counting heavily on simulation-based acquisition and training as a means through which risk can be minimized and total ownership cost can be reduced. To truly evaluate aspects of human behavior that impacts system performance, we need to model how soldiers will perform the perceptual, cognitive, and physical tasks required. However, a human behavior modeling environment that includes both procedural and cognitive aspects of human behavior does not currently exist. In addition, the available cognitive modeling architectures are difficult to use and require expertise in programming, modeling, and cognitive science. This proposal outlines a work plan for developing a modeling environment that consists of task network discrete event simulation and a cognitive architecture in a unified and integrated package. The unified architecture is designed to be used by systems engineers, analysts, and human factors professionals without backgrounds in programming or cognitive science to evaluate proposed new systems and to provide realistic training experiences through development of semi automated forces that behave more realistically.

Benefits:
Development of a unified modeling environment that includes both task network simulation capabilities and a cognitive architecture will take advantage of the strengths of each type of modeling while minimizing the shortcomings of each. The integrated environment will allow for a more complete representation of human behavior. Cognitive architectures force a fine grained approach to modeling human behavior. Task network models represent human behavior at a higher level of granularity. A benefit of a modeling environment that includes both is that models can be developed that can selectively represent behavior at the task level when it is appropriate yet allow for very fine grained models of cognition for portions of human behavior that are necessary. Both task network and cognitive models have been shown to be predictive of human behavior. Possibly the biggest benefit that we expect from this work will be that analysts, engineers, and system designers not trained in cognitive or computer science will be able to use the cognitive architecture to model human behavior.

Keywords:
Task network modeling, cognitive architecture, human behavior, simulation, performance, system design

Phase II

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase II year
2006
Phase II Amount
$730,000
In this proposal we describe the steps necessary to implement a human performance modeling tool that supports the representation of both procedural and cognitive aspects within a unified modeling environment. The proposed effort builds on our Phase I work in which we explored the integration of task network and cognitive modeling tools at both the conceptual and methodological level. The result of that work is the notion of task decomposition as a unifying framework; in the same way that overt behavior might be decomposed into sequences of (perhaps interleaved) tasks, we realized that cognitive behavior can also be modeled in these terms. We deepened our understanding of such a modeling approach with the careful consideration of possible use cases. This led to a list of needs and requirements for the integrated tool. During Phase II we will implement the software that satisfies these needs and requirements. Our implementation effort will not only effect the needed integration, but it will also allow us to re-implement a fair portion of ACT-R legacy code. The result of this effort will be a functional modeling and simulation tool that can be applied directly to the problems facing the Army during its transformation.

Keywords:
Task Network Modeling, Cognitive Architecture, Human Behavior, Simulation, Performance, System Design