SBIR-STTR Award

The Microbial Ecology of Contaminant Destruction
Award last edited on: 10/25/2002

Sponsored Program
STTR
Awarding Agency
DOD : Army
Total Award Amount
$579,491
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
A99T003
Principal Investigator
Robert F Hickey

Company Information

EFX Systems Inc

3900 Collins Road Suite 1011
Lansing, MI 48910
   (517) 336-4630
   N/A
   N/A

Research Institution

----------

Phase I

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase I year
1999
Phase I Amount
$79,491
Hexahydro-l,3,5-trinitro-l,3,5-triazine (RDX), 2,4,6 Trinitrotoluene (TNT) and octahydro-l,3,5,7- tetranitro-1 ,3,5,7 tetrazocine (HMX) are explosives widely used by the U.S. military. Past handling practices at facilities manufacturing, processing and disposing of explosives have, in many cases, resulted in environmental contamination. Leaching of these energetics into soil and groundwater from disposal lagoons has occurred at many sites in the U.S. and abroad. These explosives are susceptible to biological degradation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Anaerobic in-situ treatment requires just the addition of an electron donor. Work completed to date suggests that RDX and TNT serve as the electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions. The rates of degradation are, therefore, closer to metabolic rather than co-metabolic. This translates to the potential for rapid and complete degradation of the RDX, TNT and HMX. The overall goal of this proposed effort is to develop an understanding of what factors significantly influence the rate and extent of anaerobic transformation of TNT, RDX and HMX in groundwater-soil systems including 1) the best electron donor sources for rapid transformation of TNT, RDX and HMX and what intermediate products are formed, 2) what microbial populations are involved and 3) what are the effects of electron acceptors (i.e., SO4=~ NO3~) typically found in groundwater.

Benefits:
Our team's knowledge of the microbial populations and factors that can affect the that degradation of these compounds in the subsurface environment and how to manipulate this capability to achieve rapid and complete degradation is, however, not sufficient at this time to confidently design and operate in-situ groundwater treatment systems. This proposed effort is designed to elucidate fundamental appreciation of factors that affect the rate and extent of treatment of explosives in groundwater.

Phase II

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase II year
2000
Phase II Amount
$500,000
The U.S. Army has 21 ammunition plants in the U.S. along with a large number of Army Deports and Forts. It is estimated that 40 of these installations require clean-up of explosives contaminated soil at one or more sites. Total estimated volumes of soils are greater than 1.2 million tons. In-situ treatment of both soils and ground water is the initial know-how being developed in this effort. Anaerobic in-situ treatment promises to be lower cost compared to available remediation options, is mechanically simpler and poses less potential safety concerns (excavation and handling of soils eliminated). Based on Phase I testing, anaerobic treatment of explosives is technically and economically promising. The treatment of explosives in soils and groundwater at Army sites poses some unique challenges. Phase I results indicated that the presence of difficult electron acceptors and the explosives themselves can be inhibitory to the microbial community capable degrading explosives. The objectives of this effort are to develop additional process know-how to overcome this hurdle for treatment of explosive contaminated soils in the unsaturated zone and combined treatment of soil and groundwater in the saturated zone. USAEC estimated complete progress costs for treatment of 10,00 CY (13,000 tons) of soil to range from $280 to $299/ton for composting, $230 to $270/ton for aerobic bioslurry, $314/ton for a proprietary anaerobic bioslurry process and double that for incineration. In-siru treatment should offer a significant reduction in the cost. The system proposed is much less mechanically complex and less capital intensive than soil slurry systems and composing. Because of the elimination of the need for soil excavation and handling, the technology will be particularly attractive for application at U.S. bases in foreign countries. The information needed to proceed to the field for testing. This same base of information will be extremely useful in optimizing and improving robustness for on-site treatment of pinkwater, and other munitions production and demil related wastewater streams.

Keywords:
EXPLOSIVES, TNT, RDX, SOIL REMEDIATION, ANAEROBIC TREATMENT, ANAEROBIC TRANSFORMATION, GROUNDWATER